The two audio pieces I created which include two topics, euthanasia and sustainability were successful in terms of research and news worth, however the actual quality of the pieces in terms of audio was not ideal.
I researched my pieces thoroughly by getting qualified and professional opinions to back my discussion. These opinions were in the forms of Dc Charles Shepherd whom has supplied evidence in court in many high profile euthanasia cases. He is also a friend of Tony Nicklinson, whom is the reason my topic was news worthy as Tony recently became the first person to have his case taken to a higher court.
Manmeet Kaur was my second professional as the interview involved her discussing her job and how it is important for her to perform her job to ensure a sustainable future. This was also a newsworthy topic as it concerns the new methods in which NGO’s and IGO’s can be persuaded to change to suit environmental and ethical concerns.
The problems with my audio came later, after I had recorded the interviews, which I did through the telephone-recording studio, as our equipment didn’t work and the University’s equipment loan shop had run out of the particular mic we were using. These problems involved the levels in which Manmeet’s interview was recorded, which were very low and blotchy in parts, I don’t know the reason for this, perhaps it was due to the fact that I spoke to Manmeet from Delhi and therefore there was a greater distance between I and her.
The same problem occurred in the interview with some of the students I recorded, although not as severe as the last. However I was able to make them slightly better through upping the volume when editing in Audacity. I think the editing process was quite successful, in terms of giving the listeners the information they needed to understand the discussion, which was quite hard considering both interviews with the professionals lasted around 15 minutes. So I had to cut them down extensively.
If I had had more time I would have included some of the questions I had asked them, but to ensure both fitted into the designated time slots I found the most efficient way was to cut myself out and join the answers up so the flowed and made sense. Although in hindsight I would have cut their answers down as listening back I have let the interviewees ramble a little.
